A few questions to ponder

[fredtoast]

(07-08-2015, 09:40 AM)djs7685 Wrote:  Where do you even get passer rating allowed for the entire defense from?

http://www.nfl.com/stats/categorystats?seasonType=REG&offensiveStatisticCategory=null&d-447263-n=1&d-447263-o=2&d-447263-p=1&d-447263-s=PASSING_PASSER_RATING&tabSeq=2&season=2014&role=OPP&Submit=Go&archive=false&conference=null&defensiveStatisticCategory=TEAM_PASSING&qualified=false

(07-08-2015, 09:40 AM)djs7685 Wrote: Also, YOU are the one talking about passer rating, myself and others have been talking about how Andy Dalton looked as a QB in 2014. We don't need statistical manipulation and cherry picked numbers, we're just talking about how Andy looked as a QB throughout the year. I don't care if his passer rating was 50 or 150, over the first 5 weeks he looked confident, composed, and he made good decisions. After that, he slowly seemed to regress with the exception of a random game or two by the end of the season. I know you're too obsessed with stats to actually discuss his game, so good day.

Didn't you just insult me by claiming that I based my argument on just "because i said so"? 

The problem with basing an argument on just your opinion is that sometimes people have different, conflicting opinions.  So some of these people have to be wrong, and I can post a long list of examples where peoples opinions have been just flat our wrong.

I would take a 150 passer rating from QB who you thought "looked like crap" over a 50 passer rating from a QB who you think looks "confident".  Football games are won with production instead confidence. 

BTW debates are not won based on confidence either.  Some of the dumbest comments come from people who are very confident that they are right.