The Bengals need to move on from Jeremy Hill

[*TheLeonardLeap*]

(09-19-2016, 02:32 AM)bengalsturntup926 Wrote: Let's back up a minute, hill looked good week one gio did not. But at the same time they hardly had carries in week one.  This game I think hill had 11 carries. That's not a lot, but it was slick out for one, and we run him up the middle with no fullback again, with our interior line sucking it up, especially bodine there was no holes and there was penetration all the time. Gio looked like crap running too they couldn't get nothing going. They finally kept hitting gio on the check Downs on the comeback which made gio look superior. The center definitely still needs fixed if we want to win a championship I'm telling you guys and Marvin Lewis. Today I read westerman inactive and core, two guys I think should be playing.

Small sample size, but week 1 Hill ran for 3.4yp, Gio ran for 5.0ypc. Hill had that one good run and 8 atrocious ones. Not sure what you saw.

(09-19-2016, 02:35 AM)bengalsturntup926 Wrote: Also the reason a 34 yr old back like williams could look good was o line creating lanes and they do not split carries with anyone. This allows one back to get into the flow of the game, and the defense can't predict what you might be doing. Choose one back and give him majority of the carries and that back will probably get 100 yards. Like hill did when gio was out. Bad thing is, gio is a better dump off back then hill. Hill is more the better runner.

Hill ran for 2.0ypc. He would need 50 carries to get 100 yards. That would be over 16 straight 3-and-outs. Teams normally don't get 16 drives in a game. Gio is a better runner, blocker, and pass catcher. Hill is good at TD vulturing.