Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Which one is guilty of assault?
#31
(07-12-2015, 10:39 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: He was intentionally aggressive to a female staff member.  He was approached by a clearly displayed security officer.  He then engaged said security officer in a physical confrontation.  This isn't a back alley, the people engaging him were clearly officials.  His inane claim of self defense will be eviscerated in court, as it should be.  He's an asshole who wanted to instigate a confrontation and he got what he wanted.  Again, he's very lucky he didn't get more that he bargained for as most of the staff showed remarkable restraint.

'Intentionally Aggressive'? She told him to look. You've got it backwards. The guard engaged him. After grabbing the lanyard, it could be surmised to choke him out, and after the old guy inaudibly says something, which could be reasonably surmised as 'let go'.  The security were clearly aggressive and made no requests of the guy. They simply thought they had the right to assault him. yeah I guess it would take 'remarkable' restraint for 6 guys in their prime to subdue a guy with one foot in the grave. He did get more than he bargained for. The dufus security guy barely missed killing him. 





Messages In This Thread
RE: Which one is guilty of assault? - Devils Advocate - 07-12-2015, 11:01 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)