POTUS mum on Kate

[*bfine32*]

(07-14-2015, 01:37 PM)Benton Wrote: For real.

One had a process that was altered which led to concerns that the investigation was being done improperly to cover up any wrong doing by the officer. In was exacerbated by conflicting witness reports. So the justice department got involved to make sure the police stopped arresting journalists and detaining protesters concerned over how the investigation was being conducted — in short, the police were trying to take away 1st amendment rights.

And you're comparing that with a drug offender who got high, shot an innocent woman, was arrested, admitted guilt? Outside of where the gun came from, it seems fairly straight forward, there aren't any conflicting reports, there's no apparent mishandling of evidence or reports.


I agree about the hypocrisy, though.

Of course there is question as to whether the man that shot Kate should have even been in the Country; let alone free on the streets. DOJ and/or POTUS should probaly just ignore this issue. BTW, the man that shot Kate has pleaded Not guilty to murder.

The hypocrisy has also been outlined in the sympathetic tone taken by the Whitehouse in each instance. 

Why the strong message from the Whitehouse on the South Carolina shootings?

At least we agree on the hypocrisy both here and at the Whitehouse.