10-27-2016, 08:08 PM
(10-27-2016, 07:59 PM)fredtoast Wrote: You are correct that I switched from "allegations" to "evidence".
But you are wrong that allegations are not evidence. Mnay times the only evidence against a person is the allegation of the victim. But in Broadricks case I do not see how Clinton could be found to have done ANYTHING wrong by just asking "Do you understand everything you do?" That is in no way an allegation of a threat.
You left out the grabbed her arm part. Couldn't that be assault or the physical action with the words alter the intent of message?
Never mind, don't answer; this is fruitless. just let folks read it.
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)