10-28-2016, 06:54 PM
(10-28-2016, 06:47 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I suppose that's how someone with an open mind would view it. I saw it more as a no threat was demonstrated and they couldn't rule on inference.
Given the link provided by Pat pretty much supported my exact position on the matter.
No, the link Pat provided said that the charge of 'conspiracy' was not proven. The jurors all agree that there was a violation of the law, just not potentially the law they were charged with. Had the conspiracy part been taken off they would have been found guilty.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
