White supremacist for Trump targets independent in Utah call

[*bfine32*]

(11-03-2016, 07:33 PM)fredtoast Wrote: Why would you say that this is an unusual stance for me?

Anytime anyone makes a comment on behalf of another person and that person does not disavow it then, yes, it can be assumed that the person consents to that comment being made.

When have I ever said anything different from this?

Well the article states Trump has nothing to do with the call, so I'm not sure how it could be on behalf of him (Hence was I asked has Trump approved the message)

But you stance is if Trump doesn't publically disapprove then he approves. I guess not really an unusual stance for you; just an unusual stance for a rational person.