And so it begins....

[Benton]

That article seemed a bit one sided.

http://www.thestar.com/news/crime/2014/07/23/twitter_harassment_trial_tweets_not_harassment_just_a_different_political_view_defence_argues.html

Quote:She alleges that Elliott became fixated on her in the summer of 2012, obsessively following her tweets, commenting on them, using hashtags she created for various events and creating hashtags about her such as #fascistfeminists. She has testified that it was the frequency and volume of the tweets that caused her to fear Elliott, though she has also made clear that he never threatened her or sexually harassed her in any tweet.

Guthrie has testified that by the fall of 2012, she simply wanted Elliott to stop contacting her. “He’s entitled to defend himself to the world, but not to me,” said Guthrie.

Statute wise it might be possible to hang harassment on it. Dunno, I'm not Canadian. But if so, then she probably is guilty of it to:

Quote:Murphy has also suggested that Guthrie was not genuinely fearful of Elliott and was actually bullying him and taunting him through the use of a hashtag #GAEhole.