so much for draining the swamp

[Dill]

(11-20-2016, 02:42 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: Yes, absolutely.

If you're not a moron, when you depose a leader then you are building a nation.  Are you still confused?

One can depose a leader for many reasons, and it can have many different results--including no nation building.

In the context of US foreign policy over the last 40 years, "Nation building" (as distinct from "state-building") refers to the process of restoring a  country's economy  after removing an undesired leader. It involves building roads and schools and hospitals. It is a policy decided upon and carried out by the deposing power.

Not all countries who depose another's leader do that. And deposing a leader does not accomplish any of that automatically, i.e., it does
not automatically build schools and roads.

Still further, one may nation build without deposing a leader, as the UN and US did in Somallia in the 90s.

Even if you conflate nation building and state building, Republicans have generally opposed nation building while favoring regime change. Are they still confused?