so much for draining the swamp

[Dill]

(11-20-2016, 02:37 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: YES!!!

See if you can find the partisan butthurt in what you wrote.  I will clue you in - it's the third and fourth sentence.

If you want to talk about how Obama was inexperienced with an agenda...and largely failed for various reasons.....And how despite that the world didn't blow up.

Then, yes, come over here and have a seat next to Obama, I mean Trump.

How are you defining "failed"? Do you have an example of a successful presidency at least?

Your take on this, apparently, is that both Obama and Trump were  simply "inexperienced" when elected.  The "failed" president, a former senator and constitutional lawyer, didn't blow up the world, so why worry about the guy who strode onto the international stage promising to bomb other countries, to sue people who opposed him, to ban Muslims and to tear up treaties, all while affirming torture and nukes were back on the table.  Embracing alt-right tactics, he bullies reporters and encourages his followers to harass them as well. Today he is taking time off from using the office of the presidency to advance private business in foreign countries to tweet up a storm against Saturday Night Live and demand an apology from the cast of Hamilton.

Only "partisan butthurt" could manufacture a difference between the two situations, if I understand you. "Career staffers" and the largeness of the office will contain Trump's rough edges--which are considerably rougher than W's were.

I suggest we agree to disagree for now; the next two years--or less-- will prove one of us right.