Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Peerman gets activated not WJ3
#29
(11-23-2016, 01:58 PM)Froob Wrote: That's assuming we lose Hill. I would rather take the chances and bring WJIII back with the way our secondary is playing. I think you forgot about Dre and how he has been keeping our secondary intact... Also, Kirkpatrick's injury last game might slow him down in the coming games... just more the reason to bring back WJIII.

Losing a running back is always one play away. Especially one that has to go through non existent holes the whole game. That puts us down to one. Now how long do you think 1 running back with no one to spell him would last..... or, as someone proposed, how long do you think a tight end playing running back would last. And, with the other teams knowing we have no true running back, how long do you think Andy would last???
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:31 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 01:58 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Sled21 - 11-23-2016, 02:02 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:14 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:25 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:38 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-24-2016, 07:50 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:59 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 04:10 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - snowy - 11-23-2016, 01:48 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:47 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 01:19 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-24-2016, 07:54 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - treee - 11-28-2016, 09:18 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)