Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Peerman gets activated not WJ3
#47
(11-23-2016, 02:42 PM)Shake n Blake Wrote: Agree, but what team only keeps 2 RBs on the active roster?

Like I said, I would cut Chykie to make room for WJ3 on the 53...Assuming WJ3 is healthy...which none of really know.

Why couldn't they have brought back WJIII and cut Chykie then signed a RB or brought one up from PS?

Do we even have a PS running back?

I'm mobile and haven't been keeping up with the PS roster.

It just seems to me that a back up RB would be easier to scrape up than a CB would might contribute if for some reason they compete for post season.
[Image: 51209558878_91a895e0bb_m.jpg]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:31 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 01:58 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:14 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:25 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:38 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-24-2016, 07:50 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - BengalsRocker - 11-23-2016, 03:23 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:59 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 04:10 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - snowy - 11-23-2016, 01:48 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:47 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 01:19 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-24-2016, 07:54 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - treee - 11-28-2016, 09:18 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)