Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Peerman gets activated not WJ3
(11-23-2016, 03:23 PM)BengalsRocker Wrote: Why couldn't they have brought back WJIII and cut Chykie then signed a RB or brought one up from PS?

Do we even have a PS running back?

I'm mobile and haven't been keeping up with the PS roster.

It just seems to me that a back up RB would be easier to scrape up than a CB would might contribute if for some reason they compete for post season.

That would have been a tempting move to me.

I'd give Hill and Burkhead the carries, then bring back one of the RB's we had in camp...or some other free agent. Of course, this assumes that WJ3 is ready to go. With a pec injury he likely couldn't lift weights or do other things to prepare.
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:31 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 01:58 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:14 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:25 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 02:38 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-24-2016, 07:50 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - THE PISTONS - 11-24-2016, 12:17 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:59 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-23-2016, 04:10 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - snowy - 11-23-2016, 01:48 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 12:47 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - TKUHL - 11-24-2016, 01:19 AM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - Froob - 11-24-2016, 07:54 PM
RE: Peerman gets activated not WJ3 - treee - 11-28-2016, 09:18 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)