11-27-2016, 03:33 PM
(11-26-2016, 01:31 AM)bfine32 Wrote: As for me claiming she won a poll she clearly didn't win. Post 19 of this thread is what I was referring to:
http://thebengalsboard.com/Thread-The-runoff-vote-also-known-as-the-alternate-voting-system?highlight=castle
Really? You claimed Jill Stein won a poll Neb posted. However, in reality, Pat posted the poll, not Neb. Then using a run off system we don't even use (posted by Tree), your own tabulation of the votes indicated Jill Stein didn't win. Rather there was a tie between Stein and Johnson. (However, if you check the current results, Johnson won.) You also declared this a liberal forum based upon a sample size of 22 total votes in which the liberal candidates received the minority of votes. Furthermore, you used a run off system based upon rankings and tabulated votes without knowing individual's rankings. For example, according to my ISideWith results Jill Stein and I agree on the issues more than the other candidates. However, I wouldn't rank her any higher than third.
Long story short, everythink you wrote is wrong. Literally, everything.
Quote:I get that you find it important to prove folks wrong; I'm just not sure why.
Sounds like something I read on a t-shirt.
I'm not sure why you think we should just blindly believe anything anyone claims. You started this thread for attention. I made your wish come true. It isn't my fault everything you wrote is wrong. That's your fault. But, hey, shout out.
