11-29-2016, 12:06 PM
(11-27-2016, 07:15 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I simply agreed with Neb when he asked was it the thread he started. I remember remember taking Matt's (Actually it was Tree) method and employing it in the "Isidewith thread. Stien got the most first place votes.
To start with, Neb didn't start the thread you referenced.
http://thebengalsboard.com/polls.php?action=showresults&pid=230
So ten totals votes for Jill Stein and Hillary Clinton and this forum is "liberal" in your opinion?
Quote:If you want to proclaim that as an "everythink you wrote is wrong. Literally, everything." moment; then that speaks volumes about your mentality and your "purpose" in this forum.
"Enough about me."
These two quotes speak to your mentality and "purpose" in this forum . . .
(08-21-2015, 11:24 AM)bfine32 Wrote: It was just to illustrate how absolutely moronic scientists can be it an attempt to figure out a created being.
(08-22-2015, 09:35 PM)bfine32 Wrote: I did not say scientists were moronic. I simply said they can be (most likely should have said appear) when they try to explain something they don't understand.
I just let you guys have your fun for a time running with something that was never actually said.
You like to not say things in as many words as possible so you can later claim you didn't say what you claim you never said. Kinda like "moronic scientists," but you did not say "scientists were moronic" because you said "moronic scientists" . . . which is different. Everybody else just needs to disregard the standard practices of modern English when you use an adjective such as "moronic" to describe a noun such as "scientists." Because, inexplicibly, you weren't using that adjective to describe that noun the way everyone else is taught to use adjectives to describe nouns.
You were just explaining any time a scientiest attempts to understand anything which is created they "appear" moronic. Since everything is "created" scientists "appear" moronic everytime the attempt to understand anything and everything. Meaning they "appear" moronic all the time.
That is a stupid argument. Although, I never said your argument was stupid. Only that your argement "appeared" to be stupid when anyone attempted to understand it. Understand? (I hope not because you would appear moronic "in an attempt to figure out" something you don't understand.)
Quote:I actually started this thread as a light-hearted parallel to Zona's "Shout out to the PRers" thread, but some folks are more motivated by ugliness.
In the spirit of conversation I have recently started replying to those I once identified as nothing more that those that wanted to cause decisiveness in this forum. I now see that may have been a mistake on my part (and before we start playing Pigeon Chess; it has absolutely nothing to do with "being called out".
What does any of this have to do with "being called out"?
I've never labeled this forum as liberal, conservative, or other. I guess I need more decisiveness in my decision making process.
