12-06-2016, 03:23 AM
(12-05-2016, 10:04 PM)JustWinBaby Wrote: Specific grants may not be tied to a "result", but you tend not to get future grants if you aren't "proving" something someone hopes is going to be proven. And if no one was proving or advancing the climate change agenda, then the $100B spent annually or whatever it is on research would just go away.
I think JustWin has a point here.
E.g., If no one were proving or advancing the cancer research agenda, then public and private funding would certainly just go away. Does anyone really dispute that?
Certainly the same for deep space and deep ocean research.
So why not for Climate Change?
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)