Thread Rating:
  • 2 Vote(s) - 1 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Assisted Reproductive Technology
(12-09-2016, 05:41 PM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: The court can uphold the contract (both parties must agree to implant an embryo in a surrogate) without ordering the destruction of the embryos. In other words, the embryos remain frozen indefinitely without mutual consent. That is the part I thought was another interesting theological paradox. 

Hence The my final thought on the issue. Unless the parents budge one way or the other, "Emma" and "Isabella" will likely be on ice for a good long time.

Upon rereading, I noticed that this wasn't totally the father moving for this. Sounds more like some Louisiana Attorney is looking to get her name out there in the public view. 


And as a side note on the Mick Jagger deal. Didn't Chaplin knock up a girl when he was like 80? 

And as another side note, how in holy hell does a dude like Jagger live to 70+? 





Messages In This Thread
Assisted Reproductive Technology - bfine32 - 08-12-2016, 01:06 PM
RE: Assisted Reproductive Technology - CKwi88 - 12-09-2016, 08:49 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)