Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Proposed massive cuts to Social Security
#18
(12-10-2016, 10:50 PM)JustWinBaby Wrote: Generally correct, but I think it's actually the top 35 years with a minimum of 10 qualifying years.

I believe there's also a large number of public unions that have a pension and no SS...although there's a variety of double-dipping.

And funding of public pensions is not an entirely separate issue.  I think there are a lot of ethical and moral questions on how much future generations should be financially responsible for unsustainable benefit promises or bad calculations they had no say in.

Well given that I'm not going to write the final plan without compensation; just explaining how folks that have paid in could get some back.
[Image: bfine-guns2.png]

[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]





Messages In This Thread
RE: Proposed massive cuts to Social Security - bfine32 - 12-10-2016, 11:29 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 3 Guest(s)