12-11-2016, 05:47 AM
(12-06-2016, 03:23 AM)Dill Wrote: I think JustWin has a point here.
E.g., If no one were proving or advancing the cancer research agenda, then public and private funding would certainly just go away. Does anyone really dispute that?
Certainly the same for deep space and deep ocean research.
So why not for Climate Change?
Great questions.
Now ask yourself how many cancer cures we've been told of the past 20 years. So surely now we must have a cure for cancer?
Or maybe that's not actually good science.
Baby steps for now....eventually I'll ask you if something as controlled and specific as biological cancer research keeps getting it wrong, then what does that mean for the nascent, and infinitely more complex, Climate research?
--------------------------------------------------------
