12-14-2016, 08:26 PM
(12-11-2016, 05:47 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: Great questions.
Now ask yourself how many cancer cures we've been told of the past 20 years. So surely now we must have a cure for cancer?
Or maybe that's not actually good science.
Baby steps for now....eventually I'll ask you if something as controlled and specific as biological cancer research keeps getting it wrong, then what does that mean for the nascent, and infinitely more complex, Climate research?
More money is spent annually on cardiovascular disease than cancer so you're not even barking up the right tree. You mean they still haven't cured it? Care to much explain the r squared value of that?
