Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Russians move SRBMs to Kaliningrad
#6
(12-11-2016, 01:00 PM)Bengalzona Wrote: No. Not a criticism of Trump.

Outside of posting memes and jokes, I'm laying off of Trump... at least until next spring (i.e. giving him a chance to show what he is actually about). As for any link between Trump and the Russians, I'm waiting to see what happens with that as well. I don't think Trump will be unseated by that.


This is about Russians threatening other countries. NATO countries. If NATO does not stand up for member nations, then there is no purpose to the organization and it should disband (Article V of the NATO charter). 

I'm also interested in seeing how this plays in the EU where they also have an enabling mutual security doctrine (Item 42.7 in the Treaty of Lisbon). 

If the U.S. is a country that honors its commitments to other nations, then it does indeed mean something. 

Your thinking is so pre-Trump, B-Zona.  Since tipping the election in Trump's favor, Putin has become our ally. Our commitment is to Russia now, not some 70-year-old piece of paper.

Let's get your thinking turned around to the new order. This is about those central European countries threatening our ally, Russia--a great and (literally) HUGE country with at least three cities with sites for large, international Trump hotels.

Missiles in Kalingrad merely announce the coming shift in alliances. 
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]





Messages In This Thread
RE: Russians move SRBMs to Kaliningrad - Dill - 12-15-2016, 05:47 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)