12-16-2016, 12:21 PM
(12-16-2016, 11:58 AM)michaelsean Wrote: No just a realization that you don't understand that the order that posts occur in is relevant. Show me your link in post #8
Dear Mr. Chronology, Sir,
In post 8 I offered a solution. In post 37 you assessed it (wrongly). So, in post 38 - immediately after your weighed in, I provided a link illustrating that your assessment was incorrect.
(Then, because you indicated still didn't get it, I rehashed the whole history and fleshed it out a bit - not before, but after things occurred in logical and chronological order as outlined in the preceding 3 sentences.)
Now, let me say as politely and lovingly as possible that if you think this shows I do not understand chronology or the relevance of the order posts occur in, you are just - and this is said with all love and respect - too damned dumb for me to interact with.
Have a great day, filled with rainbows and fantasies, Mr. michaelsean Chronology, sir.
With deepest sympathies for your struggle,
xxlt
JOHN ROBERTS: From time to time in the years to come, I hope you will be treated unfairly so that you will come to know the value of justice... I wish you bad luck, again, from time to time so that you will be conscious of the role of chance in life and understand that your success is not completely deserved and that the failure of others is not completely deserved either.
