Proposed massive cuts to Social Security

[*michaelsean*]

(12-16-2016, 12:21 PM)xxlt Wrote: Dear Mr. Chronology, Sir,

In post 8 I offered a solution. In post 37 you assessed it (wrongly). So, in post 38 - immediately after your weighed in, I provided a link illustrating that your assessment was incorrect.

(Then, because you indicated still didn't get it, I rehashed the whole history and fleshed it out a bit - not before, but after things occurred in logical and chronological order as outlined in the preceding 3 sentences.)

Now, let me say as politely and lovingly as possible that if you think this shows I do not understand chronology or the relevance of the order posts occur in, you are just - and this is said with all love and respect - too damned dumb for me to interact with.

Have a great day, filled with rainbows and fantasies, Mr. michaelsean Chronology, sir.

With deepest sympathies for your struggle,

xxlt

You offered part of a solution, (you forgot where they freeze the benefit cap) and then called my analysis wrong for not assuming the rest of it. You can call all the names you want, but it doesn't change the facts. But yeah, that's cool if we don't interact. You're an unpleasant person, and I try to avoid those.