Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should LaFell be re-signed?
#29
Depends. I'd like if we brought in an explosive WR in FA (I think I saw Garcon was an option) then we should probably let LaFell find another team. However, if we don't bring any other FA WRs then we should probably keep him around.

Regardless, we really need a deep threat opposite of Green so we can force at least two DBs playing deep at all times.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Should LaFell be re-signed? - Bengalholic - 12-20-2016, 04:33 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - Au165 - 12-20-2016, 05:27 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - bfine32 - 12-20-2016, 05:30 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - corpjet - 12-20-2016, 05:43 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - Benton - 12-20-2016, 05:43 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - SHRacerX - 12-21-2016, 09:40 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - Sled21 - 12-20-2016, 06:56 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - kevin - 12-20-2016, 07:33 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - kevin - 12-21-2016, 09:06 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - PlayadLc - 12-21-2016, 01:59 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - treee - 12-21-2016, 02:58 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - Crowe - 12-21-2016, 09:25 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - SHRacerX - 12-21-2016, 09:38 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - kevin - 12-21-2016, 10:08 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - R3stangs - 12-21-2016, 12:21 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - samhain - 12-22-2016, 09:14 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)