Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Should LaFell be re-signed?
#33
Absolutely not. That money needs to be spent on Dre and possibly Zeitler. I want to see Cody Core in that role and they need another speed option from the draft. Lafell is a solid #2, but with the TEs on this roster (if they ever decide to use them), Boyd, and AJ, they don't need Lafell. Cody Core is the starting outside WR next year across from AJ with Boyd in the slot.
[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]
Reply/Quote





Messages In This Thread
Should LaFell be re-signed? - Bengalholic - 12-20-2016, 04:33 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - Au165 - 12-20-2016, 05:27 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - bfine32 - 12-20-2016, 05:30 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - corpjet - 12-20-2016, 05:43 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - Benton - 12-20-2016, 05:43 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - SHRacerX - 12-21-2016, 09:40 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - Sled21 - 12-20-2016, 06:56 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - kevin - 12-20-2016, 07:33 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - kevin - 12-21-2016, 09:06 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - PlayadLc - 12-21-2016, 01:59 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - treee - 12-21-2016, 02:58 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - Crowe - 12-21-2016, 09:25 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - SHRacerX - 12-21-2016, 09:38 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - kevin - 12-21-2016, 10:08 AM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - R3stangs - 12-21-2016, 12:21 PM
RE: Should LaFell be re-signed? - samhain - 12-22-2016, 09:14 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)