Nixon’s Vietnam Treachery

[Benton]

(01-03-2017, 02:46 PM)Rotobeast Wrote: You're right.
I contradicted myself.

If a hummer is not sexual relations, then he did not lie under oath.
I cannot have both.
I'll go with the hummer.

I mentioned in another thread where Clinton got a loophole (the definition he interpreted as him not having actions meant he wasn't having sexual relations). It would have been a lot different if people didn't giggle over words like fellatio. Because if he'd been asked if he received fellatio from her, then he would have either lied or been transparent.