01-03-2017, 05:42 PM
(01-03-2017, 05:15 PM)Benton Wrote: I mentioned in another thread where Clinton got a loophole (the definition he interpreted as him not having actions meant he wasn't having sexual relations). It would have been a lot different if people didn't giggle over words like fellatio. Because if he'd been asked if he received fellatio from her, then he would have either lied or been transparent.
Good point !
I guess my thoughts would wonder if they would afford the same loophole to someone on statutory rape charges ?
Would the adult be charged with perjury, if they first said they did not act sexually toward the minor, then admit to receiving sex from the minor ?
As always, the outcomes of such things tend to depend of the financial level of the defendant, but my brains still drifts.
