01-06-2017, 06:07 AM
(01-06-2017, 02:26 AM)Jpoore Wrote: obviously this is all about if a team is gonna reach for a qb ala bears, broncos, jets, bills, browns, jags, etc. if your gonna reach for a qb in this draft there are many better options ala garrapolo, McCarron, etc.
1 Garrapolo
2 McCarron
That's two options. Two does not equal "many." That's assuming teams believe Garrapolo and McCarron are better than all the QBs in this draft class. You listed six teams in need of a QB. Last time I checked, 6>2. Over in the draft section, you're telling people teams aren't going to reach for QBs in the first round then contradict yourself by claiming McCarron is worth a top 12 pick based upon teams reaching for a QB in the first round. LOL
Check this out . . .
(08-04-2016, 03:03 AM)Jpoore Wrote: We will trade McCarron to probably if I was a betting man the bills in the offseason as a starter for probably a second third and 5th bc one pick we get we need to replace McCarron(Jt Barrett?) so essentially getting 2 picks for him and we are always under the cap by about 10 million bc we use the rollover to extend contracts
(08-04-2016, 12:21 PM)BigRed75 Wrote: I doubt anyone offers that much for McCarron given his limited playing time though I still love his potential. You must be an Ohio State fan because no one else in their right mind would bring up JT Barrett as a potential NFL QB...he has a ZERO percent chance of making it.
(08-04-2016, 07:39 PM)Jpoore Wrote: Haha yet deshawn Watson is a number one pick? They are the same player... Anybody see 2014 season? Just saying. And yeah that might be reaching but imo he sees himself as a starter so I hope we trade him for a pretty good haul instead of trying to resign him as a backup bc that won't work
I was going to make a joke here, but decided against it because nothing I could write would be funnier than what you already did.
