01-10-2017, 07:00 AM
(01-10-2017, 01:03 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: He should go back to trolling about all the climate change studies he has read which indicate it is a fraud, but won't share. And according to his understanding of the scientific method he needs to know what I think about someone else's research before he can show why someone else's evidence based conclusions are wrong. LOL
Why would I bother dissecting study after study when you would just accuse me of cherry picking? The good science pretty much begins and ends with the log CO2 curve, which gets us nowhere near catastrophic warming. Everything else they don't know a lot more than they actually know. The science is, quite literally, being made up as they go along.
So if you want to debate, I asked you to post papers you read that you think support catastrophic warming and we can debate those studies that have formed your opinions. Since you haven't posted any, we must conclude you haven't read any, and/or don't know of any.
--------------------------------------------------------
