01-10-2017, 07:48 AM
(01-10-2017, 07:00 AM)JustWinBaby Wrote: Why would I bother dissecting study after study when you would just accuse me of cherry picking? The good science pretty much begins and ends with the log CO2 curve, which gets us nowhere near catastrophic warming. Everything else they don't know a lot more than they actually know. The science is, quite literally, being made up as they go along.
So if you want to debate, I asked you to post papers you read that you think support catastrophic warming and we can debate those studies that have formed your opinions. Since you haven't posted any, we must conclude you haven't read any, and/or don't know of any.
I didn't ask you to dissect anything. I asked you to show me the studies. That's it. Since you haven't posted any, we must conclude you haven't read any, and/or don't know of any. And since you haven't figured it out, yet, my mind is open to either possibility climate change is "a thing" or a hoax based upon the evidence. Evidence you have read and claim indicates climate change is a hoax, but refuse to show that evidence to anyone else to review.
I'm more than happy to continue your charade if you want to take it back to the other thread.
In this thread let's just concentrate on you proving the number of jobs Trump has overseas is a fact so I can prove they are a hoax.
Every field of science is being made up as we go along. That's why the science of medicine is constantly evolving as new information replaces outdated information. It's comical an expert in the scientific method such as yourself is completely unaware of a basic concept of science.
