01-24-2017, 01:35 PM
Why is it so important to some to cloud the issue as to where Human life begins? I've seen in this very thread a poster claim it begins before conception, another claim after consciousness, in the past I have seen things such as when the heart beats, the egg attaches, the fetus feels pain, it is viable outside the womb, ect....
I think we would all agree (perhaps not publically) that conception is by far the most recognized point that a human is created and the starting point of human life. This very thread is nothing more than establishing a starting point for human life. What is wrong with establishing a consensus to a scentific happening?
Should we call it the Theory of Human life or should it be a scentifically recognized fact? When this starting point is established should have no influence on your position as Pro life or Pro choice.
I think we would all agree (perhaps not publically) that conception is by far the most recognized point that a human is created and the starting point of human life. This very thread is nothing more than establishing a starting point for human life. What is wrong with establishing a consensus to a scentific happening?
Should we call it the Theory of Human life or should it be a scentifically recognized fact? When this starting point is established should have no influence on your position as Pro life or Pro choice.
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)