01-25-2017, 03:27 PM
(01-25-2017, 02:55 PM)RICHMONDBENGAL_07 Wrote: I don't think that he necessarily believes bfine is right (and correct me if I'm wrong), but without conception their is no human life correct? At any rate, you're getting pretty sciencey. Don't get me wrong, I'm pro-choice (and I believe hollo is as well), but as educated I believe that I am, I don't have the biology background that you seem to have. And neither do some of the other posters you're responding to. Which is why you're getting the responses you're getting.
I feel like I get what you're saying, but your just saying it in a more complicated way.
Just my two pennies
Correct. Without fertilization there is no human life. Without gametogenesis there is no fertilization therefore there is no human life. Without an adult human there is no gametogenesis therefore there is no fertilization and no human life. So where does the process begin? I can just as easily claim life begins with gametogenesis as someone else can claim it begins with fertilization. If you read an embryology textbook, they don't start teaching from fertilization. They actually start teaching embryology beginning before fertilization.
It's a cycle. It's circular. Tell me where a circle begins and ends. It's just that simple and complicated.
And we are back to the chicken and egg paradox.
