Riots at the Inauguration

[*bfine32*]

(01-27-2017, 05:34 PM)Belsnickel Wrote: That is a false narrative. A pro-life group was removed from the sponsors, but there were many pro-life marchers and there were no issues with them.

http://stlouisreview.com/article/2017-01-26/pro-life-groups-felt

Doesn't fit the narrative, though. And truthfully, I don't like that they removed them from the sponsorship and have yet to hear a good reason why other than they had other sponsors threaten to pull out. Which may or may not be true, but that was a rumor.

http://www.citizen-times.com/story/news/politics/2017/01/27/march-for-life-womens-march-anti-abortion-left-out/97145694/

We can trade links all night long and I'll bet you run out of them long before I do. You can say that making it known that folks that supported Pro Life were unwelcomed at the march to be a "false narrative" and I will say it is spot on. Guess we'll have to let folks to draw their own conclusion. Hopefully they can do so without bias.