01-29-2017, 02:22 PM
(01-29-2017, 12:34 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Of course you trivialize the destroying of a child that has committed no crime , you just like to look in the mirror and say you don't, while the pro-lifer does. You trivialize it by trying to throw in phrases like stripping of liberties and due process; while only considering the rights of one person in the situation. The VAST majority of the time pregnancy is nothing but a temporary inconvenience; however, every time an abortion is a permanent one.
I get the emotion that goes into the subject; however, anyone that comes to the conclusion that abortion is justified when the child is wanted by one parent that can nurture it, is trivializing the process. As I've said a truly enlightened future generation will look back ar us and judge us on our propensity to kill our unborn.
Who says I only consider the rights of one person? I have said numerous times the it is a quandry with regards to rights that cannot truly be solved by government intervention. This is why I say the government should not make that call. If you think trying to logically discuss the legal implications of the subject with the actual terms is trivializing abortion then I don't think a rational discussion can be had on the issue with you. This isn't an emotional subject for me because I am able to view this from a policy standpoint, not injecting my personal morality into it.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR