Steve Bannon.

[Belsnickel]

(02-13-2017, 04:46 PM)Mike M (the other one) Wrote: Oh I know it is and many terms get thrown around and mis-used way to much. Even the Hitler-Trump comparison is so effing stupid. Trump is no where near the same class as Hitler, and anyone that thinks that is seriously embarrassing themselves.

Every leader of every country should be a Nationalist, but that doesn't meant that they are authoritarian as well. 

But don't play stupid, There is much more to Facism than the simple terms used in the dictionary.

What personal freedom has Trump taken from you that you would regularly utilize?

We are not North Korea where you oppose Kim-Jun and your family dies.
We do not make Protesters disappear and never to be heard from again like the People's Republic of China.
We do not put out the kind of false propaganda that Iran does.
Cuba, Egypt, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and Vietnam all have that style of government, we just simply do not compare to any of them on a consistent basis.



   Stick to CNN, you can't handle the truth. 

What you might be missing from the comparisons that people understanding of the topic are doing is that you are thinking of the end result and comparing what you see in authoritarian regimes with what we see now. What most of the serious and legitimate critiques have been arguing is that the language used, the propaganda, the interactions with the media, the "alternative facts", these things are reminiscent of the early days of authoritarian regimes. What we see from Trump and his administration are behaviors that are exhibited by authoritarian regimes when they gain power.

This is the difference between opinions about the administration and what we can point to using evidence. If you see someone say that Trump and his ilk are fascists or they are authoritarians, that is an opinion. But when someone says that if you compare the behaviors of this administration to administrations that were gaining power to become authoritarian regimes you can see come commonalities and that is concerning, that is something different and instead of it being dismissed because there was a trigger word that caused you to just feel your beliefs are being attacked (something that actually happens when discussing these sorts of things, phrasing matters), it would be good to set down the MAGA glasses and read it with an attempt at objectivity. Not saying it will change your mind, or even that it should, just dismissing it out of hand isn't going to help your understanding.