I don't get it

[*bfine32*]

(03-21-2017, 05:07 PM)Benton Wrote: It had more to do about party lines and people wanting to blame someone for their problems. Obama was the sitting president, ergo Obama was to blame.

Obama wasn't up for re-election

In a couple years, someone will need to be blamed for their problems. Trump will be the sitting president, ergo Trump will be to blame. The question is how many disenfranchised come out for each side. (Although I don't think it matters, I still think he gets made a scapegoat and either steps down or impeached before the end of 4).
You think it'll take them a couple years do ya?

If people cared about the emails, they would have cared about the emails when Bush lost millions of them or when Colin Powell suggested using personal servers and phone lines. I may have missed it, but I don't recall Comey waffling on whether or not to charge Powell.

Hell I don't even remember Powell running for President. 

People only cared that "the opposition" was doing something. If it hadn't been Clinton doing what Bush and Powell did, it would have been Clinton not wearing enough flag lapel pins, her being a Muslim, her being anti-military, her being pro-Russia, etc.

That's my point exactly. Remember when Hill's first came into news with the emails? A big rallying cry was "There is no proof they have been hacked". The "See they have been hacked" became the rallying cry from the same population.