03-21-2017, 10:50 PM
(03-21-2017, 10:16 PM)bfine32 Wrote: No one said the emails were not an issue. I'm saying her sending emails from her unsecure server and deletion of evidence were the issue. I've already pointed to an early rallying cry in the Dem party was "There's no proof she was hacked.' This was used to deflect from the actual act of sending them. When that blew up it became "There's nothing damning in the Emails", then it became "The Russians did it"
If you think the trivial things those leaked emails actually said moved the dial one way or the other, then I disagree with that assertion. Just provide me withthe content of one leak that you think made a difference.
If anything leaking them helped her. What do you think the reaction would have been if all we knew was Hills email government business from her house and the Russians hacked them?
I don't remember what others said to defend her. From the beginning I've stated using insecure communication to conduct state business to avoid FOI requests was, at best, stupid.
But, I do remember you condemning her for sending classified information and now you're claiming the content was meaningless.
Regardless, the emails played a role. There are still people on this board citing Benghazi and the emails as reasons they don't trust.
But, back to your original point. The impeachment talk relates to collusion with the Russians.
