Neil Gorsuch

[*bfine32*]

(03-21-2017, 11:43 PM)GMDino Wrote: http://insider.foxnews.com/2017/03/21/al-franken-grills-judge-neil-gorsuch-supreme-court-hearing-frozen-trucker-case

Here's one.

Gorsuch is sticking with "I only look at the law".

I don't even know if he got the law right.  His argument (while I was listening today, not in the linked article) was that the driver had an option to not drive the vehicle as it was dangerous.  Since he chose to drive it he gave up his safety rights and the firing was justified. (Paraphrasing a bit.)

I believe they said he was the only one out of 9 to dissent.

I'm sure there are a few sites that took Gorsuch's side in the question and answer.  I saw the right loved that he rolled his eyes. 

It was a common theme of the day. The left kept trying to jam up Gorsuch because he didn't rule based on his feelings. It was a concept that they could not grasp. He said it's his job to rule based on the 4-corners of the documentation and that congress should litigate it. Once again, not what they are used to seeing.

I think there were 3 cases brought up all day (over and over and over). Someone brought up that the Dems are focusing on 3/1,000ths of Gorsuch's ruling to try and establish a trend. His record of being on the right (majority) side is staggering.