03-22-2017, 04:22 PM
(03-22-2017, 01:27 PM)bfine32 Wrote: As I said and Gino validated; ruling by the Letter of the Law and not your personal feelings is a concept foreign to the liberal. As I have pointed out Gorsuch's ruling have been validated at an extremely high rate, but per Liberal SOP they dug and found one case that they can use to try and point to him being a bad person (Picking the big man over the little man).
Gorsuch said he can feel bad for the driver but he cannot change the law because of it. It is what he has said he would do all along. If dude would have done anything else but drive the truck he would have been fine legally. It's not his fault that the only other option sound adults can come up with is "freeze to death". I'm sure there are cases that he has ruled in that the opposite population would not agree with. This confirmation hearing is a display of all that is wrong with the Nation's political system and those few citizens that agree with what they are doing is the reason for these acts.
Yeah, no.
He interpreted the law different than 9 others.
Maybe, probably, possibly, based on his "feelings" not about the people involved...but the law.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.
