Bengals resigning Peerman.

[*Wyche'sWarrior*]

(03-23-2017, 07:56 PM)Murdock2420 Wrote: From what I have read Burkhead wanted a chance to get more carries and with Hill/Gio + whoever they draft high this year, the writing was on the wall. 

Not too mention (and I doubt Rex would say it) why would he stay here behind this O-line and be 3rd on the depth chart when he can go to New England with a better O-line and a coaching genius and get to split carries and win a playoff game.

Peerman to me is a no big deal signing. Have to get 90 guys to camp, and this is a vet who causes no trouble and is a special teams leader. No harm at all in signing him.

I don't disagree with what you're saying.....I disagree with the Bengals sticking with 2 yard Jeremy over Burk.

(03-23-2017, 08:48 PM)coachmcneil71 Wrote: Peerman seems to be a great guy, but I couldn't agree more with this. Essentially, just wasting a prime roster spot on a one dimensional player, at a position that we traditionally only carry three of.

I mean if he was Steve Tasker, Brian Mitchell, or Bill Bates I may feel differently. 

Precisely.....