03-31-2017, 10:42 PM
(03-31-2017, 10:36 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: I'd guess people who think "assault weapons" have no legitimate self defense purpose.
I guess. I suppose the choice of weapon in this case didn't raise many eyebrows given it actually WAS used for self defense.
(03-31-2017, 10:36 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: Check, The Trace, Everytown and Moms Demand Action. All of them make arguments that "assault weapons" serve no legitimate civilian purpose. They are weapons of war! Now that i think about it, there have been several posters on this board who've made similar arguments.
I have zero idea what those are. I guess there can be a discussion about what you "need" versus what will "work" versus what you "want", but, again, in this case it was actually used for self defense so I don't see the problem.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.