03-31-2017, 11:00 PM
(03-31-2017, 10:49 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Most likely fortunate for the occupant that he had a weapon capable of taking down multiple armed intruders quickly as opposed to the type of weapon many think he should be allowed to have.
(03-31-2017, 10:50 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Everything is controversial.
(03-31-2017, 10:55 PM)Sociopathicsteelerfan Wrote: You, not surprisingly, miss the point. The anti-2A crowd would prohibit this young man from owning the weapon he used to defend himself in this scenario. The claim that such fire arms serve no legitimate civilian purpose is a common trope among these types. The fact that you, personally, don't see a problem with this incident is irrelevant. The fact that many are actively attempting to ban such firearms is.
I'm going to guess he didn't have a ten round magazine either. Yes, it's supposition but I think it's a logical one.
Welp. Seems like you two have a lot to talk about then. The rest of us didn't have a problem with it. Carry on.
![[Image: giphy.gif]](https://media0.giphy.com/media/1kwsTjL8BNqlszNtnCE/giphy.gif)
Your anger and ego will always reveal your true self.