The OK case

[Dill]

(04-02-2017, 03:43 PM)bfine32 Wrote: You are quickly becoming the king of the Straw Man around here as nobody said it HAD to be a "military-style" weapon. I am saying an AR 15 was used and was suitable for the job. 

Of course the debate is not settled. Folks have said they don't want citizens possessing certain type of firearms and nothing will change their minds.

Somebody (a straw man?) said we'd only be speculating if we thought a handgun or shotgun could have done the job, and then said the military style got it done. So is somebody speculating now that the weapon didn't have to be a military style? 

And somebody pronounced the debate settled in this forum.

Except "they" are at it again, so the debate is still on, though not really a debate because NOTHING will change THEIR minds. "We" of course are different. Something would change ours. It just doesn't.