04-02-2017, 10:05 PM
(04-02-2017, 06:43 PM)Dill Wrote: Somebody (a straw man?) said we'd only be speculating if we thought a handgun or shotgun could have done the job, and then said the military style got it done. So is somebody speculating now that the weapon didn't have to be a military style?
Of course we're speculating if we think; however, we are not speculating when we point to what really happened. I truly don't know how to answer the question you have asked, but I'll give it a go: Yes we are speculating if we say it didn't have to be a "military style" (whatever the hell that is); as that is not what was used in this situation.
Quote:And somebody pronounced the debate settled in this forum.
The debate is most likely only settled among rational folks. I overestimated the audience.
Quote:Except "they" are at it again, so the debate is still on, though not really a debate because NOTHING will change THEIR minds. "We" of course are different. Something would change ours. It just doesn't.I have zero idea what you have said it these 3 sentences. Perhaps you or someone can "dumb it down" for me.
![[Image: bfine-guns2.png]](https://i.ibb.co/YBkDQJV/bfine-guns2.png)
![[Image: 4CV0TeR.png]](https://i.imgur.com/4CV0TeR.png)