The OK case

[Sociopathicsteelerfan]

(04-03-2017, 01:43 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: A semi auto AR-15 will deliver more effective fire than one with a 3 round burst or auto. So why is the platform which delivers more effective fire not a weapon of war while the platforms which deliver less effective fire are weapons of war?  Interestedly enough, we only used the 3 round burst at the range and semi auto during combat.

As I've said in the past, I'm not really interested in the semantic argument you seem to crave in this thread.  I suppose by your standard the M1 Garand my father owns is a weapon of war.  In essence you've just made an argument that all magazine fed semi-auto rifles are "weapons of war"  That just seems to be... dumb.


On the other hand the K98 is a Wizard of Wor!