The OK case

[*bfine32*]

(04-03-2017, 10:28 AM)oncemoreuntothejimbreech Wrote: I would consider any standard issue battle rifle for an infantryman used for combat a "weapon of war."  Just because an M1 is obsolete compared to a M-16 doesn't change the fact the M1 was a standard issue battle rifle for an infantryman.

Pretty sure the M-16 is obsolete as far as military issue

But as to the bigger point: The weapon matters little. the intent of the user determines if it is a "weapon of war". Hell, I've seen folks use rocks.