The OK case

[Rotobeast]

(04-03-2017, 06:00 PM)Dill Wrote: I'm sure I can.

I was commenting on the double standard in your use of "we" and "they." I see no evidence anything could change your mind, but you would distinguish yours from "theirs" by claiming nothing can change theirs. "They" want to impose their personal preferences on folks via law (weapons they deem suitable), which implies the preferences you would impose (weapons you deem suitable) somehow rise above personal preference. You are "rational"; "they" are not.

But a rational guy ought to understand something of logical implication.

A "military style" weapon is one which is or mimics military issue weapons. There term is most frequently used now in reference to guns which are or intended to mimic assault weapons like the M-4 or AK 47. A Winchester Model 04 30.30 would not be a military style weapon, nor would a Remington pump shotgun. An AR 15 would be a military style weapon.

They make an AR-15 in .22 long rifle.
Do folks consider that an "assault rifle", because it's aesthetically very similar ?