The OK case

[GMDino]

(04-05-2017, 04:37 PM)bfine32 Wrote: Nope I referred to the entire sentence by bring up the mention of a Militia. what part did I leave out?

BTW, "my view" is that you should have a permit for any weapon that leaves your house.

I have no idea where the hypocritical accusation came in.


Do you want to share your interpretation of the 2nd or just stick with the "gotcha" attempt?

The hypocritical part is calling any decision that disagrees with your view as "judicial activism" and any that agrees is correct.

You quoted one part (bolded here) of the entire amendment:

Quote:A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

I assume it was done to show how the courts were wrong until they agreed with you in order to show how "judicial activism" was what happened BEFORE they agreed with you.

anyway, your hang up with "gotcha" is rather annoying though.  If you don't want anyone to ever doubt or question what you say you might be in the wrong place.