The OK case

[*bfine32*]

(04-05-2017, 04:49 PM)GMDino Wrote: The hypocritical part is calling any decision that disagrees with your view as "judicial activism" and any that agrees is correct.

You quoted one part (bolded here) of the entire amendment:



I assume it was done to show how the courts were wrong until they agreed with you in order to show how "judicial activism" was what happened BEFORE they agreed with you.

anyway, your hang up with "gotcha" is rather annoying though.  If you don't want anyone to ever doubt or question what you say you might be in the wrong place.

So that's a no on your interpretation of the second?