04-05-2017, 08:35 PM
(04-05-2017, 08:08 PM)JustWinBaby Wrote: LOL, you honestly think Rice's appointment was apolitical?!? You think Rice was an apolitical person?!?
And there's more of a smoking gun here, so far, on the Obama administration than anything with respect to collusion between the Trump organization and Russia.
It may not be illegal, but it raises VERY serious questions about ethics and political motivations. Of course, between the IRS shenanigans and wire tapping the AP this is maybe not surprising.
Much ado about nothing....mmmkay
No one is an apolitical person, but a person whose job is political strategy has no place in a room where politics are supposed to be checked at the door.
If you think there is more of a smoking gun on the Rice thing that on collusion between those around Trump and Russia, well, you may have missed (or ignored) some of the information out there in that regard.
The requests are made by the NSA to the agency for the unmasking specifically to prevent political abuses. If there were no legitimate reasons for the NSA to know the information then they would not be unmasked. Is there a possibility that there were still political motivations? That can't be denied, but it isn't as cut and dry as a lot of people are trying to make it out to be.
"A great democracy has got to be progressive, or it will soon cease to be either great or a democracy..." - TR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
"The test of our progress is not whether we add more to the abundance of those who have much; it is whether we provide enough for those who have too little." - FDR
